Everything looks investable.
Until someone checks.
We're the ones who check.
Before you wire the money. Before the board signs off. Before you find out the hard way, eighteen months in, that the thing you bought is not the thing you were shown. Funders, investors, corporates, owners — if you're about to bet on a business, we tell you what's actually true about it. Then, if something's missing, we send someone to go and fix it.
Your commitment keeps climbing.
Your evidence does not.
Here's what actually happens on every deal.
Money goes in. Headcount goes in. Reputations get attached to the outcome. That line climbs from day one and never stops.
The evidence line? It flatlines the moment the business case gets signed off. Nobody goes back to check. Checking is slow. Checking is unglamorous. And every so often, checking finds the answer nobody in the room wanted to hear — which is exactly why nobody volunteers to do it.
That gap between the two lines is the risk you haven't priced yet. We measure it while it's still cheap to close, not after you've signed.
Nobody has ever been promoted for finding out they were wrong.
The reason organisations cannot mark their own homework is not dishonesty. It is incentives. The person who runs the numbers again and finds the problem becomes, in that moment, the obstacle. The person who keeps the deal moving is the one everybody thanks.
So the checking either gets done by someone with no career riding on the answer, or it does not get done at all. That is the entire service, and it is why the useful version of it has to come from outside the building.
It is also why we are direct about what we find. A soft finding is not a kindness. It is an invoice you pay later.
Verify it. Ready it. Staff it.
We bring independent judgement, commercial evidence and experienced operators to the decisions that sit between ambition and proof. Three lines, one standard. Most work starts at one of them and moves to the others, because the finding and the fix are rarely bought by the same person on the same day.
Independent commercial, technical and operational diligence for funders, investors, corporates and business owners, plus the transaction support to get the deal done. Written to be acted on rather than filed.
Explore Due Diligence →For founder-led businesses turning over US$2m to US$20m. We diligence you before a buyer does, move the judgement out of your head into a system the team can run, and take the business to a standard that prices well.
Explore Investable Ready →How a finding becomes a fix. Experienced operators placed into the gap the diligence or the readiness work exposed, with a defined mandate and an end date.
Explore Fractional Teams →Find out what your evidence is actually worth.
Twelve questions, about eight minutes. You get a score across five weighted dimensions, a level on the Investable Standard, and the specific gap holding it back. No call required to see the result.
Judgement built on real transactions.
Corporate strategy, mergers and acquisitions, corporate-wide innovation and IT transformation programmes, venture building and founder development.
Strategic transactions led or advised on across a twenty eight year career spanning technology transformation and mergers and acquisitions, rather than by the firm.
Across African markets, including cross-border and multi-jurisdiction transactions.
We are a good fit when...
If more than two of these are true, the conversation is usually worth having. If none of them are, we will tell you that rather than sell you something.
Capital, a deal or a mandate is about to be committed, and the case underneath it has not been independently tested.
The company works, and everybody quietly knows it would not work for long without the founder in the middle of it.
Somebody already did the analysis. Nothing changed, because no finding had an owner or a date attached to it.
You need someone to challenge the numbers who has no career riding on the answer, which nobody inside the building does.
What does your evidence
actually support?
Twelve questions about one opportunity. You get a score across five weighted dimensions, the specific gap holding it back, and the next move we would recommend. Nothing is stored unless you choose to send it to us.
Five weighted dimensions. Evidence carries the most weight, because it is the one that most often turns out to be missing.
If the evidence dimension scores below half marks, the result is capped regardless of everything else. A strong plan built on an untested problem is still an untested problem.
A score out of 100, a level on the Investable Standard, and the specific gap holding the opportunity back.
This is an indicative screening tool, not professional advice. It scores only the answers given. It does not consider your circumstances, and it is not a substitute for due diligence or for legal, financial, tax or investment advice. Many factors that would determine a real decision are not captured here, including matters neither party may be aware of at the time of completion. No reliance should be placed on this result and no decision should be taken on the basis of it alone. Investable and Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd accept no liability for any decision taken or not taken in reliance on this output. Obtain professional advice before acting.
Next level
Where the score comes from
What we would do next
Send this result to Investable
If you want a view on it, send the score through. We will come back with a written read on the two things most likely to break this opportunity, before any conversation about working together.
This result is an indicative screening output, not professional advice. It reflects only the answers provided and has not been verified by us. It does not take your specific circumstances into account and is not a substitute for due diligence or for legal, financial, tax, accounting or investment advice. A real decision depends on many factors this tool does not assess, including matters that neither party may be aware of at the time of completion. No reliance should be placed on this result, and no decision to proceed, to stop, to invest, to acquire or to dispose should be taken on the basis of it alone. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Investable and Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from any action taken or not taken in reliance on this output. Obtain appropriate professional advice before acting.
Most diligence is written
to be filed.
Ours is written to be acted on. Independent commercial, technical and operational due diligence for funders, investors, corporates and business owners, followed by the transaction support to get the deal done. And where the diligence finds a gap, we can put someone in it.
Half of all diligence never becomes a plan.
Research on transactions is consistent and uncomfortable. Around half the time, the diligence carried out before a deal fails to give the buyer a usable roadmap for capturing the value they just paid for. The report informs a decision and is then filed.
The consequences show up later, in the first ninety days, when nobody can remember what the data room actually revealed and the people who read it have moved on to another mandate.
We write diligence as an execution document. What is true, what is at risk, what must happen first, and who does it. Then we stay for that part.
Every startup curve ends at the acquisition.
Real ones do not.
There is a well known chart, drawn first by Paul Graham, of the emotional path a founder walks: uninformed optimism, a crash, a long trough, and finally the promised land of an acquisition. It is usually drawn ending there, at the top, at the deal. As though the story is over the moment the wire transfer clears.
It is not over. It is just that nobody is watching any more.
Four buyers, one standard of evidence.
Independent assessment of applicants and investees for state agencies, development finance institutions and grant funders. Technical readiness, commercialisation risk, management capability and the evidence behind the claim. Reporting built to survive an audit rather than to satisfy a committee.
Buy-side commercial and operational diligence on targets, and portfolio reviews on assets already held. We tell you what the founders have not, and we are direct about which risks are priced and which are not.
Diligence on acquisitions and internal ventures, with the group standard applied honestly. Often the useful finding is that the target runs on one person, which is a valuation question rather than a footnote.
Buy-side diligence for owners acquiring a competitor or a supplier, and vendor diligence for owners preparing to sell who would rather find the problems before the buyer does.
Four stages, and the last one is the point.
Before any data room opens, we agree which findings would actually alter the price, the structure or the answer. Diligence scoped to cover everything covers nothing well and costs more.
Produces · A scoped question listRaw data rather than management packs. Customers rather than references. The distinction between what we were told and what we saw is recorded explicitly throughout, because that distinction is the report.
Produces · Verified findings, sourcedEvery material finding carries a consequence and an action: renegotiate, structure around it, fix it in the first ninety days, or walk. A risk without an owner and a date is an observation, not a finding.
Produces · A first ninety days planWhere the diligence exposes a capability the business does not have, we can place a fractional operator to hold it while a permanent hire is found. This is the part almost nobody offers, and it is where the value actually lands.
Produces · A named person, with a mandateWhat we cover, and what we do not.
We are deliberate about the boundary. Being clear about what we do not do is what makes the rest credible.
Commercial and market diligence. Technical and technology readiness, including commercialisation risk. Operational diligence. Management and key person assessment. Customer and revenue verification. Integration and first ninety days planning.
Statutory audit, legal opinions or tax structuring. We work alongside your auditors and attorneys rather than pretending to replace them, and we will say so in the first meeting rather than the third.
For funders running many decisions at once.
A single diligence report answers one question. A funder makes hundreds of decisions a year and has to defend all of them later, often to someone who was not in the room. The Decision Ledger is how those decisions stay traceable.
What this programme or fund may decide, with whose money, and who can overrule it. Vagueness here is why decisions get relitigated two years later.
One written standard applied to every applicant, agreed before the applications arrive. A standard written afterwards is a justification, not a standard.
Every decision recorded with the evidence under it, who made it, and when it is revisited. This is what an auditor, a board or a public accounts committee will ask for.
Decisions tested against what actually happened, so the criteria improve rather than simply persist. Very few funders ever check whether their gate was predictive.
Four ways to use us.
A fast read on whether a target or an applicant is worth full diligence. Fixed fee, short turnaround, and a written answer that is allowed to be no.
Scoped to the questions that would change the decision, delivered as findings plus a first ninety days plan rather than as a document.
Alongside your corporate finance adviser and attorneys, from diligence through to completion, so that what was found in the data room actually reaches the agreement.
Ongoing diligence capacity for a fund, a programme or a funder with continuous deal flow, including panel appointments.
You were the evidence engine.
That does not scale.
Every good decision this business ever made ran through your judgement. You knew which customers mattered, which complaints were signal, which deals were real. That worked beautifully, and it is now the ceiling. We move that judgement out of your head and into a system your team can run, and we build the business a buyer would actually pay a premium for.
It is not that you are a bottleneck.
It is what you are a bottleneck for.
Plenty of advice will tell you to delegate more. That misses what is actually happening. The thing your team cannot do without you is not the work. It is the judgement: knowing which of two plausible options is right, which customer complaint is a pattern and which is noise, which deal is real and which is a polite maybe.
You built that judgement in the field over a decade, and none of it is written down. So the business can add people and revenue but it cannot add decision-making capacity, and past a point that is the same as not being able to grow.
Delegating tasks to people who cannot make the call just moves the queue. The work is to externalise the judgement itself.
Things founders say in the first meeting.
"Nothing gets decided while I am out of the country."
"We are growing and I am taking home less than I did two years ago."
"My best people keep asking me questions they should be answering."
"I know which numbers matter. Nobody else in the business does."
"Every client somehow becomes a custom job."
"If I stepped away tomorrow, this would be worth a fraction of what people think."
It is charged in three currencies.
Every week spent adjudicating is a week not spent on the handful of decisions that genuinely require you. The irony is that the more indispensable you become, the less of your actual value the business receives.
The company can only grow as fast as one person can make judgement calls. You can hire past a capacity problem. You cannot hire past a judgement problem, and most founders spend a year discovering the difference.
Buyers do not pay for revenue. They pay for cash flow that survives you leaving. Founder dependency is priced in quietly, in the multiple, and it is almost never itemised in the offer.
The uncomfortable version: the more valuable you personally are to this business, the less valuable the business is to anyone else. That is not a character flaw. It is arithmetic, and it is reversible.
Four levels. You are on one of them right now.
Most owners cannot say how ready their business is, because nobody has ever measured it against what a buyer or a funder would actually look for. The Standard is that measure. Each level has a gate, and you do not claim the next one until the gate is passed.
Diligence run on your own business, to the standard a buyer or a funder would apply, early enough that findings are still fixable rather than repriceable. Including the things nobody wanted written down.
Gate · An honest baselineEvery decision that currently routes through you gets a named owner, a written threshold and the evidence to decide on. Not delegation of tasks. Delegation of judgement, which is the part that has never been written down.
Gate · Right calls made while you are unreachableWhere the diligence found a capability gap, a fractional operator holds the seat until a permanent hire lands. This is the level almost nobody reaches alone, because it needs people in chairs rather than a plan in a document.
Gate · Ninety days, founder out of the critical pathCustomer concentration, contract quality, margin durability and reporting all hold under scrutiny from a buyer, a lender or an investment committee. Whether or not you sell, this is what the business is worth defending.
Gate · A data room you would open tomorrowSix things that outlast the engagement.
Written rules for the calls that currently need you. What can be approved, by whom, on what evidence, and at what point it comes to you anyway.
A weekly, monthly and quarterly cadence that surfaces problems while they are still cheap, rather than at the point where they arrive in your inbox as emergencies.
A small number of measures that actually predict the outcome, owned by named people. Most dashboards measure what is easy to count and nothing that changes a decision.
Named people with real authority and the evidence to use it. Built with the team you have wherever possible, and honest with you where it is not.
One acquisition channel that works without your personal network attached to it, measured properly, with economics you can defend to a buyer or a lender.
Numbers assembled the way a buyer, a bank or an investment committee will want to see them. Built now, quietly, so that a process later takes weeks rather than months.
When the constraint stops being you
and starts being the market.
Once the business can make decisions without you, the next ceiling is usually the size of the market you are in. That is the right moment to test an international one, and the wrong moment is any time before it, because a founder-dependent business cannot survive its founder spending a month abroad.
Most market access programmes end at the airport. A delegation flies out, sits through panels, photographs a stage, and comes home with business cards and no pipeline. The failure is not the trip. It is that the trip was the whole programme.
Decide which buyer, in which market, and why. Build the target list. Book meetings with people who hold budgets rather than intermediaries who hold introductions. Agree in writing what result would make you enter and what would make you walk away.
Gate · A list and a threshold, or no tripStructured conversations with buyers, channel partners and the people who would have to say yes internally. Notes taken to a standard, so what you heard survives the flight home. Evenings for synthesis rather than networking.
Gate · Real demand, or an honest noThe part almost nobody does. Follow-up owned by a named person, proposals out, pilots negotiated, and the practical questions answered: entity, tax, regulatory, pricing, who delivers.
Gate · Enter, wait, or choose elsewhereA small group of scaling companies travelling to the same market on fixed dates. Shared logistics and cost, with preparation and conversion run individually because the buyers are not the same. Suits sponsors funding several companies at once.
One company, one market, chosen to fit the proposition rather than the conference calendar. If your buyers are in a city nobody runs missions to, that is where we go.
Buyers are not buying what you think they are buying.
Every founder assumes the conversation will be about revenue and growth. It is about risk. A buyer is pricing the probability that the cash flow continues after you have gone, and every dependency they find is a reason to pay less or to structure more of the price as an earn-out you have to stay around to receive.
The things that quietly cost you: customer concentration, contracts that renew on relationship rather than on paper, margins that only work because you personally price the difficult jobs, and reporting that cannot be reconciled without you in the room.
None of that is fixed in the six months before a sale. It is fixed two to three years earlier, which is usually before the founder has admitted to anyone that they are thinking about it.
This is for you if...
You turn over between US$2m and US$20m, with a team that is capable but still routes the real decisions through you.
You are well past product-market fit and stuck in the part where growth adds complexity rather than margin.
You are willing to have your own decisions audited, which is the part most founders find hardest.
You are thinking about an exit in the next three to seven years, even if you have not said so out loud.
You are willing to invest in systems and technology, because judgement cannot leave your head without somewhere to put it.
Skip this if...
You are pre-revenue or still looking for product-market fit. Start with a structured programme that gets you into market and tests the idea properly, such as Founder Institute. Come back once you are generating revenue.
You want a coach or a sounding board rather than someone installing systems inside your business.
You want the benefits of a leadership layer without giving any of the decisions away.
You need the answer to be that everything is basically fine. Sometimes it is. Usually the founder already knows it is not.
Three routes in.
Owner-managed businesses funding the work themselves, usually because the alternative is another three years of the same week repeating.
Value creation inside a portfolio company. We work to the investment thesis and report against it, and we will tell you when the constraint is the management team rather than the market.
An internal venture or acquired business that has traction but has not been built to run at group standard. Often paired with our due diligence work.
Fractional Teams
Senior capability, in the seat, for exactly as long as it is needed. Diligence tells you what is missing and readiness work tells you what has to change, but neither happens on its own. This is how a finding becomes a fix: a named operator with a defined mandate and an end date.
The hire you cannot justify is usually the one you cannot do without.
Every growing business hits the same wall. There is work that plainly needs someone senior, and not enough of it to justify a permanent salary, benefits and the risk of getting the hire wrong. So it gets absorbed by whoever has capacity, which is usually the founder, or it does not get done.
Hiring too early burns cash you needed for something else. Hiring too late costs a year. Fractional is the honest answer to the period in between, and the period in between is longer than most owners expect.
There is a bigger idea underneath it. The companies that compound fastest are the ones whose capability can move as quickly as their opportunities do. That is difficult when every increase in capability means a permanent appointment, a payroll commitment and a twelve month recovery if the person is wrong.
Capability that moves at the speed of the opportunity.
A permanent hire is a fixed cost attached to a variable need. It arrives slowly, it is expensive to reverse, and it commits the business to a shape it may not hold in eighteen months. That is a reasonable trade for a settled business. It is a poor one for a business trying to grow quickly.
Fractional inverts it. You take capability up when a market opens, a transaction lands or a function breaks, and you take it down again when the need passes, without carrying the overhead, the notice periods or the difficult conversation. Two days a week for six months, then nothing. Or one day a week indefinitely, which is often all a function needs.
The point is not saving money on a salary. It is that the business stops being limited by what it can afford to commit to permanently.
Useful at every stage, for different reasons.
This is not only an early-stage instrument. The reason changes as the business grows, but the shape of the need does not.
A business with revenue but no leadership layer. One experienced operator two days a week is worth more than three junior hires, and costs less. The goal is to buy judgement, not hours.
The stage the Investable Standard calls Running. Someone holds the seat while the systems get built and the permanent hire is found, so growth is not gated on one recruitment process going well.
An acquisition closes and the finance function turns out to be one person and a spreadsheet. The first ninety days are the wrong time to run a search. We put someone in on day one and start the search from a stable base.
A resignation at the wrong moment, a sudden gap, or a departure the business had been quietly dreading. An experienced operator steadies it, documents what only that person knew, and hands over properly.
For funds and groups: shared senior capability across several portfolio companies, none of which could carry the cost alone. One capable finance or commercial lead across four businesses is a common and unusually efficient arrangement.
A named senior person on an investment committee or a venture board, with a defined mandate and an end date. Someone with no career riding on the answer, which is the only way an organisation reliably gets an honest one.
What we place.
Numbers a board or a lender can rely on, cash discipline, funding readiness, and the reporting that a transaction will eventually demand.
First revenue in a new segment, channel design, pricing, and the sales motion that has to work before a permanent hire makes sense.
Delivery, systems and the unglamorous process work that decides whether growth improves margin or quietly destroys it.
Turning a validated proposition into something shippable, with a roadmap tied to commercial evidence rather than to enthusiasm.
Running the venture, the integration or the programme day to day while a permanent leader is found and brought up to speed.
Independent presence on a board or committee, with the mandate written down and a date on which it ends.
Named people. Written mandate.
An end date.
Every engagement starts with what the operator owns, what success looks like, and when it stops. If we are still there after the mandate ends without a good reason, something has gone wrong.
No pooled resource, no account manager standing between you and the person doing the work. You meet the operator before you commit.
The mandate includes documenting what they built and training whoever inherits it. An operator who leaves a dependency behind has not finished.
The point at which a permanent hire becomes better value than us is a point we will name out loud, and it is usually earlier than a staffing firm would tell you.
Who is asking
the questions?
A fair thing to want to know before you let someone examine your business, or the one you are about to buy. Investable is a small South African advisory firm built to do one thing properly: establish what is actually true about a business, and then help fix what is not.
Because the checking rarely gets done.
Across a long career in corporate strategy and transactions, the same pattern kept appearing. Decisions worth hundreds of millions resting on a case nobody had independently tested. Not through carelessness, but because the person best placed to test it was the person whose project it was.
Organisations cannot mark their own homework. Not because people are dishonest, but because the person who finds the problem becomes, in that moment, the obstacle. So the checking either gets done by someone with no career riding on the answer, or it does not get done at all.
That is the firm. Independent judgement, commercial evidence, and operators who can act on what we find.
Keshni Morar
Founder and Chief Executive. Twenty eight years across corporate strategy, mergers and acquisitions, corporate-wide innovation and IT transformation programmes, venture building and founder development.
The transaction experience covers more than twenty complex deals across African markets, including cross-border and multi-jurisdiction transactions, with a cumulative value of around $4.5 billion. The transformation work matters as much: it is why technical diligence is not outsourced here, and why a conversation about a company's systems does not have to be translated for us.
Alongside the commercial firm, she leads the Investable Foundation, and is the local partner for Founder Institute in South Africa.
Buy-side and sell-side diligence, deal execution and integration, across corporates, funders and owner-managed businesses.
Corporate-wide innovation and IT transformation programmes, which is where the technical and operational diligence capability comes from.
Building businesses from validated opportunities, and knowing from experience which parts of the plan usually break first.
More than three hundred founders supported since 2021, of whom over seventy five reached a market.
Deliberately small.
Deliberately senior.
We do not carry a bench. Every mandate is staffed from a network of senior operators we have worked alongside for years, assembled for the specific problem and released when it is solved.
That is not a compromise. It means you get people who have actually run the function rather than whoever was available, and it means our overheads are not quietly priced into your fee. It is also why we can say no to work: we are not feeding a payroll.
We work with a small number of engagements at a time, which is a capacity decision rather than a posture, and it is why we assess fit before proposing a conversation.
The formal part.
100% Black Woman-Owned. Spend with us is recognised at 135% of value on your preferential procurement scorecard.
Local partner in South Africa, and the route through which our founder development methodology was built and tested.
Strategic partnerships that give South African businesses routes into markets and mentor networks beyond it.
We take no commission from funders, lenders or acquirers, and we hold no position in anything we assess. Our fee is the only thing we earn from an engagement.
We work under mutual non-disclosure as standard, and client names are shared only with written permission. Which is why you will not find a logo wall here.
A separate non-profit entity running founder development, skills and agriculture programmes. See the Foundation ↗
Terms, privacy, disclaimers and PAIA
These terms govern your use of this website. By using the site you agree to them. If you do not agree, please do not use the site.
Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd, trading as Investable. Gauteng, South Africa. Last updated 10 August 2026.
Terms of use
Acceptance
By accessing or using this website you agree to be bound by these terms, our privacy notice and our disclaimers. We may amend these terms at any time by posting a revised version. Continued use after any change constitutes acceptance of the revised terms.
Information is general
All content on this site, including any assessment, scoring tool, framework, article or download, is provided for general information only. It does not constitute professional advice of any kind, including legal, financial, tax, accounting, investment or business advice, and it does not take account of your particular circumstances or objectives. No client, advisory, fiduciary or professional relationship is created by your use of this site or by any communication submitted through it.
No warranty
The site and its content are provided as is and as available. We make no representation or warranty, express or implied, that the content is accurate, complete, current, fit for any purpose, uninterrupted or free of error or harmful components. Any outputs generated by tools on this site depend entirely on the information you supply, which we do not verify.
No reliance
You must not rely on any content on this site. Any action you take on the basis of it is at your own risk. Before making any decision you should obtain appropriate professional advice from an adviser who has assessed your specific circumstances.
Limitation of liability
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd, its directors, employees, contractors and associated entities are not liable for any loss or damage of any kind, whether direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive, and including loss of profit, loss of opportunity, loss of data or reputational harm, arising from or in connection with your use of this site, your reliance on any content, or your inability to access the site, whether the claim arises in contract, delict, statute or otherwise, and whether or not we were advised of the possibility of such loss.
Indemnity
You indemnify and hold harmless Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd, Investable Foundation NPC, and their directors, employees, contractors and associated entities against any claim, demand, action, loss, liability, damage, cost or expense, including legal costs on an attorney and own client scale, arising from or in connection with your use of this website, your breach of these terms, your reliance on any content, any information you submit through the site, or any claim brought by a third party in connection with your use of the site or its outputs.
Intellectual property
All content on this site, including text, graphics, frameworks, methodologies, assessment logic, trade marks and layout, is owned by or licensed to Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd and protected by law. The Ground Truth Loop, the Decision Ledger and the Investable Standard are our proprietary frameworks. You may view and print content for your own internal, non-commercial use. You may not reproduce, adapt, distribute, publish or commercially exploit any content without our prior written permission.
Third party links
This site may link to third party websites. We do not control those sites, we do not endorse their content, and we accept no responsibility for them or for any loss arising from your use of them.
Governing law
These terms are governed by the laws of the Republic of South Africa. You consent to the jurisdiction of the South African courts in respect of any dispute arising from these terms or your use of this site.
Severability
If any provision of these terms is found unenforceable, that provision is severed and the remaining provisions continue in full force.
Privacy notice
Who we are
Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd, trading as Investable, is the responsible party for personal information collected through this website, as contemplated in the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA). Our Information Officer is Keshni Morar, Chief Executive, reachable at hello@investable.business.
What we collect
We collect only what you choose to give us: your name, email address, organisation, role and whatever you write in a free text field, together with any answers you submit through an assessment. We do not collect special personal information and we do not knowingly collect information about children.
Why we collect it
To respond to your enquiry, to prepare for a conversation you have requested, and to meet legal or regulatory obligations. We do not sell your information, we do not share it for marketing purposes, and we do not add you to a mailing list without your consent.
Who we share it with
Only with service providers who host the site, process form submissions or provide analytics on our behalf, under obligations of confidentiality, and with regulators or authorities where the law requires it.
Cross-border transfer
Some of our service providers process information outside South Africa. Where this occurs, we take reasonable steps to ensure a comparable level of protection as required by POPIA.
How long we keep it
For as long as needed to respond to your enquiry and to meet legal obligations, after which it is deleted or de-identified.
Your rights
You may ask what personal information we hold about you, request correction or deletion, object to processing, or withdraw consent. Contact us at hello@investable.business. You may also lodge a complaint with the Information Regulator of South Africa.
Cookies and analytics
We use essential cookies required for the site to function, and Google Analytics to understand how the site is used. Analytics cookies are not set unless you accept them through the banner shown on your first visit. Your choice is stored on your own device and you may change it by clearing your browser storage for this site. IP addresses passed to Google Analytics are anonymised. We do not use advertising cookies and we do not sell or share analytics data.
Disclaimer
Assessments and tools
Any assessment, score, level or output produced by tools on this site is an indicative screening output based solely on the answers given. We do not verify those answers. The output does not take account of your circumstances and is not a substitute for due diligence or for legal, financial, tax, accounting or investment advice. Many factors that determine a real decision are not assessed, including matters neither party may be aware of at the time. No decision to proceed, stop, invest, acquire, dispose or fund should be taken on the basis of an output from this site.
Not an offer
Nothing on this site constitutes an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or subscribe for any security or financial product, or to enter into any transaction.
Not regulated financial advice
We do not hold a licence under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 37 of 2002, and nothing on this site is advice on financial products as contemplated in that Act. Where an engagement requires FAIS-regulated advice, this is provided only through appropriately licensed third parties.
Forward looking statements
Any statement about future performance, market conditions or outcomes is an opinion, not a prediction, and actual outcomes may differ materially.
Foundation
Investable Foundation NPC is a separate legal entity from Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd. The two entities do not share liability and neither is responsible for the obligations of the other. Statements about tax treatment of donations are general. Deduction limits and qualifying conditions apply and donors should confirm their own position with SARS or a tax adviser.
PAIA manual
Manual published in terms of section 51 of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 (PAIA), read with the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA).
1. Particulars of the body
Opal Ice Investments (Pty) Ltd, trading as Investable, a private company incorporated in the Republic of South Africa. Physical and postal address: Gauteng, South Africa. Email: hello@investable.business. This manual also covers Investable Foundation NPC, non-profit company registration number 2026/031990/08, NPO number 334-886-NPO, PBO number 930089484, which is a separate legal entity.
2. Information Officer
Information Officer: Keshni Morar, Chief Executive. Contact: hello@investable.business. Requests for access to information must be directed to the Information Officer.
3. The section 10 guide
The Information Regulator has compiled a guide in terms of section 10 of PAIA containing information on how to exercise rights under the Act. It is available from the Information Regulator of South Africa, and may be requested from that office directly.
4. Records available without a request
The following are available on this website or on request without a formal PAIA application: our service descriptions, published frameworks, terms of use, privacy notice, this manual, and Foundation programme information and reporting formats.
5. Records held
Company records including founding documents, statutory registers, minutes and resolutions. Financial records including accounting records, tax records, banking records and statutory returns. Client and engagement records including proposals, engagement letters, non-disclosure agreements, working papers, deliverables and correspondence. Personnel and contractor records including agreements and payment records. Marketing and website records including enquiry submissions and assessment submissions. Foundation records including programme design, participant records, funder agreements and monitoring and evaluation reporting.
6. Records held under other legislation
Records are held in terms of, among others, the Companies Act 71 of 2008, the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011, the Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991 where applicable, the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997, the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003, POPIA and the Nonprofit Organisations Act 71 of 1997 in respect of the Foundation.
7. How to request access
A request must be made on the prescribed form and submitted to the Information Officer at the address above. The request must provide sufficient detail to identify the record and the requester, state the right the requester seeks to exercise and why the record is required to exercise it, and specify the form of access required. The prescribed fees payable are those published under PAIA. A decision will be given within thirty days, subject to any permitted extension. Where access is refused, reasons will be given together with the remedies available.
8. Grounds for refusal
Access may be refused on the grounds set out in Chapter 4 of Part 3 of PAIA, including the protection of the privacy of a third party, the commercial information of a third party or of the company, confidential information held by a third party, information privileged from production in legal proceedings, and research information.
9. Processing of personal information under POPIA
Categories of data subjects and their personal information: prospective and current clients, being contact and organisational details, enquiry content and engagement records; contractors and service providers, being contact, contracting and payment details; Foundation participants, funders and mentors, being contact details, application and programme records; website visitors, being form submissions and, where consented to, analytics data. Personal information is processed for the purposes of responding to enquiries, delivering engagements and programmes, meeting legal and regulatory obligations, and reporting to funders. Recipients include service providers who host or process on our behalf and regulators where required by law. Security safeguards include access control, confidentiality obligations and reputable hosting and processing providers. Cross-border transfer occurs where a service provider processes outside South Africa, subject to comparable protection.
10. Availability and updates
This manual is available on this website and at our address on request. It is reviewed annually and updated as required.
What decision
are you trying to make?
Tell us what is commercially important and not yet proven. We read every enquiry ourselves and come back with a view, not a calendar link.
Selective by design. We work with a small number of high-consequence engagements where senior attention, evidence and execution matter. That is a capacity decision rather than a posture, and it is why we assess fit before proposing a conversation.